Compare and Contrast role model: Richard Dawkins Essay

When choosing a role model according to my Christian worldview there are several positions taken into account. Their position and look on Sexuality, Social Issues, and the Nature of divinity are areas in which our agreeing or disagreeing is a major contri moreovering factor throughout the decision making process. Because of our foundational beliefs, Richard Dawkins does not meet the most lenient of qualifications according to my Christian worldview in exhibition to serve as a role model.According to my Christian worldview a role model drop be defined as a soulfulness whose belief system universe based upon their acceptance that matinee idol is the creator of the universe, has sent his only begotten Son as the founder for sin, and trusting the Holy scriptures are the inerrant and infallible word of perfection. Richard Dawkins erst stated, Genetic engineering science is important for the future of the compassionate species and that our emerging engineering of altering certa in human cells will affect individual constituent pool in order to dictate human way and sexuality (Harris, 1984).This statement implies humankind posses the knowledge of what it takes to create a somebody and to gear up their sexual doings outside of the Christian worldview. In believing human behavior has a constituenttic basis whereby altering specific genes we can create individual as we see fit is the very expound that Adolf Hitler apply when attempting to create a master race.prof Dawkins believes the possibility of engineering human being exist where my Christian worldview says, biblical scriptures provide the required truth on deity not only creating humankind notwithstanding also that matinee idols Holy Spirit will affect human behavior without gene manipulation. The Christian worldview beliefs on sexual behavior differ from professor Dawkins suggesting it is genetically based. Christianity teaches, humanity was created in the image of perfection (Genesis 126), theology determines the gender of a child, and God has the ability to change the deviant behavior of people.As I continued efforts towards invalidating Richard Dawkins as a accomplishable role model his questionable strength on stillbirth came to head teacher as I read an article entitled Abortion and Dawkins deceitful Account of the So-called grand Beethoven Fallacy. The article discussed professor Dawkins ethical and moral understanding on abortion as it relates to the Great Beethoven Fallacy and religion. Though he bible does not let the cat out of the bag about aborting a child directly, scripture does make a trait between killing as a result of an act of God and killing as a result of premeditation (Exodus 2112). Christianity foundational belief in Jesus and the teachings of Jesus stands against all forms and efforts to stop procreation among humankind. God while speaking words of encouragement to Jeremiah says, Before you were in the venter I make you and before y ou came out I gave you purpose or a reason for living (Jeremiah 15).In other words, the Christian worldview stands against supporting abortion or any form of human macrocosm control efforts that cause the death of Gods children. prof Dawkins opinion differs from a person sharing in the Christian worldview by claiming, The measuring stick for abortion is the suffering of the fetus (McLachlan, 2009). professor Dawkins proposing questions such as Does the pregnant muliebrity or the family suffer is immaterial when God identifies with the fetus before the giving birth process begins.In addition to the fetus or the family suffering in respect to aborting the child, consideration was also placed on the mental aspects of the family. For instance, terminating arresthood due to psychological issues, health of parents or number of children could also be a deciding factor in aborting the child. The final area used to rule out the possibility of Professor Dawkins dowry as a role model f or me or anyone with a Christian worldview was his foundational belief concerning the existence and nature of God.Professor Dawkins book entitled The God Delusion, characterization of God in saying, The God of the Old Testament is arguably the most ungrateful character in all fiction jealous and proud of it a petty, unjust, unforgiving control-freak, a vindictive, bloodthirsty ethnic cleanser a misogymstic, homophobic, racist, infanticidal, genocidal, fihcidal, pestilential, megalomamacal, sadomasochistic, freakishly malevolent bully (Baker, 2009, p. 75). During his childlike rant Dawkins proved, he was incapable of serving as a role model to anyone whose foundational belief was Christianity.By question Gods absolute authority, Dawkins implied God was unable to judge humankind righteously. A person with a limited understanding of scripture yet posses the Christian worldview may feel challenged as they read Dawkins statement of God as being jealous. In all actuality the Biblical scriptures contained in the book of Exodus speaks of God being jealous but not in the context of Professor Dawkins statement. By definition, Dawkins reasoning meant someone that is envious of another because of his or her achievements and advantages.The dissimilitude in Dawkins definition of jealousy and the Holy Scripture is in the variation of Exodus 205, which does not pertain to the sin of jealously but rather the act of giving someone else something (Worship) that only belongs to God. In closing, Professor Richard Dawkins is not a person I would choose to be a role model based on the following facts, his belief that gene manipulation will determine the outcome of human behavior as compared to my believing God created us individually without gene manipulation.Professor Dawkins stance for supporting abortion says the measuring stick should be the suffering of the fetus, mother and father, as compared to my believing God identifies with us before we are formed in the mothers wo mb. Finally, the argument that nullifies any chance that Professor Dawkins meet the qualification of serving as my role model was his characterizing God as having the same sinful nature of humanity.