The Relations of the United States and the United Nations Essay

The Relations of the United States and the United NationsThe history of the USs relationship with the UN is complex, seeming to vacillate between warm cooperation and abject haughtiness as the national interests of the US and the rest of the world, and the short- and long-term interests of the US itself, dress or oppose each other. The UN was originally the vision of US president Franklin Roosevelt and the product of US State Department planning and diplomacy. It was designed to send on the national interests of its strongest members, the P-5, to reflect and channel the geopolitical top executive structure kinda than twist it into an unnatural and unsustainable hierarchy of weak nations trying to dominate strong. Because the get is based in a realist view of the world, during the chilly War, when the national interests of the deuce world advocators diverged, the UN was paralyzed to deal with any of the worlds conflicts. When the Cold War ended it gave rise to the first w ar that should have been trustworthy by the credentials Councilthe Persian Gulf War from later 1990 to earliest 1991. Many hoped for a new world order after the supremacy of the Gulf War, but the interests of the US and the rest of the world, primarily the rest of the members of the Security Council, soon divided again. Today, the world is still struggling to cope with the fumble dealt to the UN by the USs use of force in Iraq, including the US, which has not even begun to feel the long-term negative effects of its unilateralism. However, the war in Iraq could have been less detrimental to the UN and the US in particular, and by source to the rest of the world, if the US had argued that it was acting to uphold resolution 1441 under the federal agency of the Security Cou... ...Furthermore, by offering a little more of its power to the world, the US would appear to bind its hands and encourage cooperation in proximo operations. The US will not be the worlds strongest powe r forever, and it would be wise to invest some of its power today in strong norms and international laws that future countries, like China for example, would be jump out to follow in the future. The UN is a theatre of realpolitik where members (the powerful ones, in particular) pursue their own interests. Over the past sixty years of its existence, it has remained the equivalent picture of the world that it reflected in 1945, but the world has drifted away from this picture. For the UN to cure its effectiveness, especially after the war in Iraq, it must reform. The true strain of President Roosevelts vision for global peace and security is whether form is possible today.