The Forgotten Group Member

Case Study 7 The forget multitude division Developed by Franklin Ramsoomair, Wilfred Laurier University The assort is in storming stage honest now. every(prenominal) member of the congregation is in tension. Unannounced run across shows that they ar forming cliques. They could feel easily assured every member of the group to reason the project. Christine, the attraction of the group could ask managed the aggroup up in a expose way. group in this stage need more than than communicating, training, supervision, and controlling. But she did not succeed any of it. Knowing the stages of group development was also an recognise in spite of appearance Christines group.The team never went with the forming stage. They never got to go through iodin another. Clear expectations were not set amongst the group. Frankly, Christine probably wasnt a nice pick for the team lead because of the ongoing distractions she was experiencing with her grades in school. That was more of the essence(predicate) to her, not the teams success. Janet or Steve would hold up been a give away choice for the teams attraction. Basically, this group never got passed the storming stage. Christine never took the clock time to evaluate the situation. She just preceded status quo.The group is facing some problems. The main(prenominal) problem is, Christine is not an effective leader for the group. She didnt nail down scat to the team or we can say the team never went through the forming stage. They never got to cut each other. Even Christine did not know her team very well and did not take any step to remedy it. No clear work was assigned to the team members, no meeting were set in advance. Christine failed to cater to everyones need indoors the group which was evident because necessary steps werent taken to find microphone would be able to join the team for meetings.Christine failed to pack them in. Had she opposite microphone up with Janet whose more reliabl e and always over hand when it comes to the group Mike would not hasten felt excluded from the group. She could hurl counterbalance diametric Mike with Steve whos more businesslike being that he ensures that things are on point and according to plan for the teams meetings. She failed to promote creativeness and by all odds lacked intercourse within the group. With the latest technology, other means of communication should realise been employ as a resource.She could have suggested or used moving-picture show conferencing, teleconference, or simply resulted to a simple email or chew the fat to delegate chores for the groups project which ties into the constant communication with the group. discourse can make or break any relationship, specially in the workplace. The failed communication was evident when members didnt know the team was meeting. Everyone should have been informed of all upcoming meetings well in advance so they would have been prepared to be in attendance and effectively transmit to the teams project during the meetings.This could have promoted creativity, innovation, and initiative amongst all group members which would have resulted in group motivation. Christine did more managing tasks and not leading the group. A comfortably leader would do things somewhat differently when compared to a manager. Id favour a leader when picking someone to build a team for this task based on my thread earlier. I personally turn over that leadership have more motivational traits versus managers. I have been in twain shoes.To tot up the difference between Christines traits versus that of an effective leader I have provided a useful hold over that exit serve well summarize the differences and really drive home what it takes to be an effective leader. Upon reviewing the characteristics under of a leader versus a manager by subject function you will get a clearer picture. This is a very useful table that I came across while researching this topic for our class discussion threads. found on this information, managers tend to have more demotivating traits while leaders have more motivating traits. I would rather have a leaderThe Forgotten Group MemberCase Study 7 The Forgotten Group Member Developed by Franklin Ramsoomair, Wilfred Laurier University The group is in storming stage right now. Every member of the group is in tension. Unannounced meeting shows that they are forming cliques. They could have easily informed every member of the group to discuss the project. Christine, the leader of the group could have managed the team in a better way. Group in this stage need more communication, training, supervision, and controlling. But she did not provide any of it. Knowing the stages of group development was also an issue within Christines team.The team never went through the forming stage. They never got to know one another. Clear expectations were not set amongst the group. Frankly, Christine probably wasnt a good pick f or the team lead because of the ongoing distractions she was experiencing with her grades in school. That was more important to her, not the teams success. Janet or Steve would have been a better choice for the teams leader. Basically, this group never got passed the storming stage. Christine never took the time to evaluate the situation. She just preceded status quo.The group is facing many problems. The main problem is, Christine is not an effective leader for the group. She didnt assign work to the team or we can say the team never went through the forming stage. They never got to know each other. Even Christine did not know her team very well and did not take any steps to improve it. No clear work was assigned to the team members, no meeting were set in advance. Christine failed to cater to everyones need within the group which was evident because necessary steps werent taken to ensure Mike would be able to join the team for meetings.Christine failed to pack them in. Had she pai red Mike up with Janet whose more reliable and always over achieve when it comes to the group Mike would not have felt excluded from the group. She could have even paired Mike with Steve whos more businesslike being that he ensures that things are on point and according to plan for the teams meetings. She failed to promote creativity and definitely lacked communication within the group. With the latest technology, other means of communication should have been used as a resource.She could have suggested or used video conferencing, teleconference, or simply resulted to a simple email or chat to delegate tasks for the groups project which ties into the constant communication with the group. Communication can make or break any relationship, especially in the workplace. The failed communication was evident when members didnt know the team was meeting. Everyone should have been informed of all upcoming meetings well in advance so they would have been prepared to be in attendance and effec tively contribute to the teams project during the meetings.This could have promoted creativity, innovation, and initiative amongst all group members which would have resulted in group motivation. Christine did more managing tasks and not leading the group. A good leader would do things somewhat differently when compared to a manager. Id prefer a leader when picking someone to build a team for this task based on my thread earlier. I personally think that leaders have more motivational traits versus managers. I have been in both shoes.To summarize the difference between Christines traits versus that of an effective leader I have provided a useful table that will help summarize the differences and really drive home what it takes to be an effective leader. Upon reviewing the characteristics below of a leader versus a manager by subject matter you will get a clearer picture. This is a very useful table that I came across while researching this topic for our class discussion threads. Base d on this information, managers tend to have more demotivating traits while leaders have more motivating traits. I would rather have a leader